The truth about the Russia investigation has finally emerged, confirming what many, including the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), had argued all along: the Russia collusion narrative was not just a flawed investigation but a deliberate attempt to undermine the legitimacy of President Donald Trump’s presidency.With the release of a previously classified annex to Special Counsel John Durham's report, the long-standing accusations that the investigation was politically motivated are now backed by smoking-gun evidence that further exonerates President Trump and exposes systemic misconduct within federal agencies.The ACLJ, a steadfast defender of the Constitution, played a crucial role in challenging the Russia investigation from the outset. Executive Director Jordan Sekulow, Senior Counsel for

Litigation and Public Policy Ben Sisney, and Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow all served as President Trump’s personal legal counsel during the investigation.

This newly declassified material does not only validate their defense of President Trump; it also exposes the deep corruption that allowed the Russia hoax to continue for years, diverting attention from the real threats facing the nation.The annex reveals that federal agencies had exculpatory evidence early in the investigation—evidence that would have immediately debunked the collusion allegations had it been properly disclosed.Instead, key documents were suppressed, and a false narrative was perpetuated, leading to years of wasted resources, divisiveness, and constitutional violations. The most crucial revelation in the Durham annex is that federal law enforcement agencies were in possession of exculpatory evidence from the very beginning of the investigation.

This evidence, had it been disclosed or properly considered, would have immediately dismissed the Russia collusion narrative. The investigation, which was initially justified under the premise of national security, was, in reality, an effort to create a narrative that served political interests.The annex goes into greater detail about the suppression of evidence, the coordination among agencies to maintain a false narrative, and the deliberate misconduct that characterized the investigation.It has been clear from the outset that the FBI was at the center of this misconduct. The timeline, actions, and strategies used by those involved in the investigation make it evident that this was no ordinary case of prosecutorial overreach but an orchestrated effort to nullify the results of a democratically elected president.The smoking-gun evidence in the Durham annex proves that the Russia investigation was built on a foundation of lies and suppression. Federal agencies knew the allegations were false, yet they pursued them aggressively to undermine President Trump’s administration.The annex underscores that these actions went far beyond errors made by a few rogue individuals within the FBI. It was a coordinated effort by the highest levels of government to create a crisis where none existed, using the power of federal law enforcement to interfere in the political process.From the beginning, the ACLJ warned that the Russia investigation represented a direct assault on the constitutional principle of separation of powers. It was not just about one individual but about an effort to undermine the office of the president itself.

The actions of unelected bureaucrats sought to nullify the 2016 election and overturn the will of the American people.The Durham annex confirms these concerns. The investigation, which was supposed to be about national security, was actually an attempt to destroy a presidency through fabricated legal proceedings.

The misuse of federal agencies for political purposes undermines the integrity of the rule of law and demonstrates how easily power can be abused when there is no accountability.This coordinated effort, according to the newly declassified materials, was not just an isolated case of political bias but a systematic attempt by the previous administration to target President Trump.From the beginning, there was a deliberate attempt to create a narrative that could be used to delegitimize Trump’s election and presidency. This wasn’t just an attack on one man—it was an attack on the democratic process itself.A critical element of the Russia investigation was the involvement of the Justice Department and the FBI in perpetuating false narratives. Even as more evidence emerged that debunked the claims of collusion, these agencies continued their investigation without regard for the facts.The Durham annex sheds light on how intelligence that would have exonerated President Trump was either ignored or actively suppressed.The evidence that was hidden or disregarded shows a clear pattern of misconduct. It wasn’t simply a case of poorly executed investigations—it was a calculated effort to manipulate public perception and maintain a false narrative.The misuse of the Justice Department and the FBI to carry out a politically motivated witch hunt undermines the credibility of the entire justice system.For years, critics of the investigation were dismissed as conspiracy theorists. The mainstream media, political opponents, and other institutions ignored the mounting evidence that contradicted the Russia collusion narrative.

The release of the Durham annex is the moment that those critics, including the ACLJ, are vindicated. The truth has come to light, and it is more damning than anyone could have imagined.The revelations in the Durham annex are not just politically significant—they are legally explosive. The documents shed light on the deep corruption that infiltrated the FBI and other federal agencies, revealing a level of coordination that transcended individual misconduct.This raises the question: how high did the corruption go? What major players were involved in this effort to undermine President Trump?The legal implications are far-reaching. The annex highlights that the Russia investigation was driven by a political agenda and that the misuse of government agencies to achieve political goals is a violation of constitutional principles.The ACLJ has long argued that the investigation lacked legitimate predication and was politically motivated from the start. The new evidence provides undeniable support for these arguments.As the ACLJ continues to seek accountability for this unprecedented abuse of power, the legal community must grapple with the consequences of these revelations.

As the ACLJ continues to seek accountability for this unprecedented abuse of power, the legal community must grapple with the consequences of these revelations.The investigation into President Trump was not just a misuse of prosecutorial discretion—it was an assault on the very foundations of our government. The misuse of federal agencies for political purposes raises serious questions about the integrity of the justice system and the potential for future abuses of power.The release of the Durham annex is just the beginning of a larger effort to uncover the full truth of what happened during the Russia investigation. In the coming weeks, the ACLJ will release a series of detailed reports that examine the evidence contained in the annex and demonstrate how it validates the legal arguments made on behalf of President Trump.

Each installment will expose specific instances of FBI misconduct, the suppression of exculpatory intelligence, and the coordinated efforts to perpetuate a false narrative.The revelations contained in the Durham annex demand immediate action and accountability. It is not enough to simply acknowledge the misconduct that occurred—it is essential that those responsible for orchestrating this politically motivated investigation be held accountable.The ACLJ will continue to push for transparency and justice, ensuring that the American people understand the full extent of the corruption that took place within the government.What happened to President Trump was not just an attack on one individual—it was an attack on the democratic process and the principles that underpin our nation. The Durham annex has provided the evidence needed to hold those responsible accountable and restore faith in the integrity of our government.The release of the Durham annex represents a victory not just for President Trump but for the American people. It proves that the truth will ultimately prevail, even when powerful institutions seek to suppress it.The ACLJ has always stood with the Constitution and the rule of law, even when it meant standing alone against the tide of misinformation and political bias.Justice may be delayed, but it is not denied. The release of this key evidence is a step toward healing the divisions created by the Russia investigation and restoring faith in the institutions that are meant to serve the American people.The ACLJ will continue its mission to ensure that the full truth about what happened during this dark chapter in American history is revealed.

Justice may be delayed, but it is not denied. The release of this key evidence is a step toward healing the divisions created by the Russia investigation and restoring faith in the institutions that are meant to serve the American people.The ACLJ will continue its mission to ensure that the full truth about what happened during this dark chapter in American history is revealed.

As we move forward, the lessons of this period must be remembered. The abuse of power that occurred during the Russia investigation cannot be allowed to happen again.It is essential that we hold those responsible accountable and ensure that future generations are protected from the weaponization of government institutions for political purposes.The release of the Durham annex marks the beginning of a new chapter in the fight for truth, justice, and constitutional governance. The ACLJ remains committed to standing for the rule of law and ensuring that the American people receive the full truth about what happened during this pivotal moment in our history.

A federal judge overseeing the Justice Department’s push to unseal grand jury records from Ghislaine Maxwell’s criminal case has requested more information before issuing a decision. In a four-page order filed Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer stated he intends to rule “expeditiously” but noted the DOJ’s initial motion lacks sufficient detail to address the legal standards required for disclosing secret grand jury material, ABC News reported.

Engelmayer directed the DOJ to submit a supplemental brief by July 29 that explains in greater depth its justification for seeking the release of the records. The brief must also clarify whether prosecutors have already reviewed the transcripts and if victims were notified prior to the filing. Additionally, the DOJ must file — under seal — an index of all relevant grand jury materials, the full transcripts, a redacted version proposed for public release, and any other pertinent documents.

Defense attorneys for Maxwell also responded on Tuesday, requesting access to the grand jury transcripts before formally stating their position. “We have not seen them, and our understanding is that they have never been provided to the defense in their entirety,” wrote defense lawyer David Oscar Markus. He emphasized that reviewing the transcripts is necessary for Maxwell’s legal team to offer a meaningful response. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche reportedly does not oppose allowing the defense access to these materials.

Separately, the judge set an August 5 deadline for victims in the case to submit their views on whether the grand jury records should be made public. The case has gained renewed attention after President Donald Trump directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to release additional Epstein-related files, citing transparency concerns. Bondi confirmed that Blanche will soon meet with Maxwell and stated that the DOJ is prepared to hear any credible evidence she may provide involving crimes against victims.

The move has sparked political backlash, particularly from Democrats who view it as a politicization of the justice system. Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) accused Blanche of acting as a “political agent” for Trump and potentially offering Maxwell leniency in exchange for politically useful information. Meanwhile, former Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz told Fox News that while no official “client list” exists, some redacted names in FBI reports may implicate prominent figures. He mentioned George Mitchell, Bill Richardson, and Ehud Barak as individuals named in victim interviews but stressed that accusations alone do not equate to guilt.