MUST WATCH: CNN Calls Out Hakeem Jeffries to His Face psss
MUST WATCH: CNN Calls Out Hakeem Jeffries to His Face
CNN’s “Inside Politics,” host Dana Bash pushed House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries aggressively on the ongoing government shutdown and questioned his party’s role in resolving the impasse.
Bash repeatedly challenged Jeffries’s narrative that Democrats were ready to negotiate, suggesting instead that the real paralysis lay within Democratic leadership’s own demands.
At one point, Bash pressed Jeffries: “You say you want to talk, but Speaker Johnson apparently hasn’t been given permission to meet with you — have you tried knocking on his door, walking down the hall?”
Jeffries responded that Republicans had cut off communication, arguing that informal meetings would not be fruitful without willingness on the part of congressional leadership.
But Bash would not let the exchange end there.
She pressed whether the Democratic proposal — which included extending Affordable Care Act subsidies and reversing GOP healthcare cuts — was negotiable, or whether it was a nonstarter.
Jeffries maintained that Democrats remained open to bipartisan solutions but insisted Republicans had gone “radio silent.”
The tension escalated when Bash framed a question in a blunt, almost confrontational tone: “You could probably take a few steps… have you tried that?”
At several junctures, Bash’s questioning seemed designed to corner Jeffries into accountability, undermining his attempt to shift blame entirely to Republicans.
She also raised the inconsistency of Jeffries’s position, pointing out that what he called “negotiable” may not actually be open to compromise if Democrats hold firm on all their demands.
Jeffries attempted to shift the blame back, saying Republicans had repeatedly tried to repeal the ACA and were unwilling to extend subsidies without structural changes.
Bash followed up by asking whether he would support a one-year extension of those subsidies if Republicans would allow it.
Jeffries demurred, saying he was not ready to accept that narrow fix without broader action.
Through the interview, Bash adopted a skeptical posture toward Jeffries’s narrative — something that conservatives seized on as evidence that even legacy media are now pushing back harder on Democratic talking points.
Conservatives applauded Bash’s refusal to act as a passive conduit for official messaging. One commentator called the moment a turning point in media deference.
Social media users echoed the sentiment: “Even leftist CNN’s Bash shuts down Jeffries’ shutdown whine — caught off guard with brutal challenge.”
The exchange also undercut Jeffries’s argument that Democrats were trying to negotiate in good faith.
Bash sought to expose whether those overtures were real or rhetorical cover.
From a conservative vantage, this marked a welcome line of questioning from mainstream media — one that forces Democratic leaders to defend their posture rather than allowing them to dominate the narrative unchallenged.
The interview ended without a clear breakthrough, but the dynamic was telling: more pressure on Jeffries, less room for him to stick to the standard talking points.
In the coming days, this exchange may be referenced by Republicans as evidence that Democratic leaders aren’t being upfront about what they’re willing or unwilling to give up in negotiations.
BREAKING: Anna Paulina Luna Claims The Biden DOJ DESTROYED…

Representative Anna Paulina Luna has leveled explosive information against the Biden Department of Justice, claiming that critical materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation have been deliberately destroyed.
This assertion, if proven true, would represent one of the most damning instances of governmental obstruction and cover-up in recent history.
Luna, who chairs a congressional task force focused on federal transparency, has stated unequivocally that she possesses evidence implicating high-ranking officials in the DOJ.
According to her, these officials not only failed to disclose materials related to Epstein but actively destroyed them to conceal the extent of powerful individuals’ involvement in Epstein’s criminal network.
She introduced legislation titled the SHRED Act, aimed at imposing severe penalties on government agents who destroy or conceal federal records. The proposed bill calls for 20 years to life in prison for anyone caught eliminating evidence in cases of national significance.
“Even if they are conducting a criminal investigation, you should probably pick up the phone and call us,” Luna told Fox News. “We have been more than patient.”
These developments come amid growing conservative suspicion that the Biden administration has no interest in unmasking Epstein’s full network. The notion that key records could be gone forever only intensifies fears that justice is being buried under a bureaucratic rug.

Luna’s office has reportedly sent multiple requests to the Department of Justice demanding clarity on the handling of Epstein-related materials. So far, those inquiries have been met with either vague responses or complete silence.
The congresswoman did not mince words in her public statements, suggesting that the DOJ’s behavior constitutes a deliberate act of obstruction. If true, such actions could violate federal law and trigger an entirely new legal battle.
“The Biden DOJ has obstructed Congress, ignored subpoenas, and now appears to have destroyed critical evidence,” Luna said. “This is corruption at the highest level.”
Critics argue that this is yet another example of double standards in Washington. “Had this been a Republican-led DOJ accused of destroying documents in a child sex trafficking case, the media would be apoplectic,” one conservative commentator noted.
For years, the Epstein case has symbolized the deep rot within America’s elite circles. The financier’s suspicious death in prison and the subsequent lack of high-profile indictments have fueled accusations of a widespread cover-up.
Now, Luna’s allegations breathe new life into those concerns. If records were indeed destroyed, the implications are profound. It would mean that the DOJ, under Biden, actively shielded criminals from justice.
What’s more troubling is that these destroyed materials could have named prominent individuals—politicians, celebrities, and global financiers—who participated in or enabled Epstein’s crimes.
In this context, Luna’s SHRED Act isn’t just legislative symbolism. It is a clarion call for accountability in an era marked by elite impunity. Her bill seeks to ensure that future officials think twice before erasing truth from the historical record.

Despite Luna’s repeated calls for transparency, there has been no formal response from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The silence speaks volumes to many who believe the DOJ is stonewalling on purpose.
Meanwhile, conservative lawmakers have rallied behind Luna. A growing number of Republicans in the House and Senate are voicing support for investigations into the DOJ’s handling of Epstein evidence.
Some have even floated the idea of appointing a special counsel to probe the matter independently. Given the stakes, such a move may be the only path forward to restore public confidence.
This latest scandal further erodes the credibility of an already battered Department of Justice. From the Hunter Biden laptop fiasco to the political targeting of conservatives, the agency has been repeatedly accused of partisanship.
Now, with Epstein documents allegedly destroyed, the DOJ’s credibility is in tatters. Public trust, once broken, is hard to rebuild.
The American people deserve the truth. And if Luna’s allegations are accurate, they deserve justice, no matter how high the guilty parties sit.
BREAKING: Tom Homan Reveals an Investigation is Underway Into AOC For…

Border Czar Tom Homan confirmed that a federal investigation is underway into Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for allegedly employing a criminal illegal alien and helping others evade federal immigration authorities.
Speaking from his post as one of President Trump’s top immigration officials, Homan revealed that ICE has launched a formal probe after multiple allegations emerged against the congresswoman.
“This is a live federal investigation. We’ve asked ICE to take immediate action,” Homan said during a televised interview.
The individual in question is reportedly an undocumented alien with a criminal record, unlawfully hired by AOC’s office.
According to internal reports, the employee had multiple encounters with law enforcement and should have been deported years ago.
Homan stressed that AOC’s potential interference with ICE operations could amount to obstruction of justice.
“This goes beyond hiring an illegal alien. There’s evidence she actively helped shield this person from deportation,” he stated.
Conservative leaders are sounding the alarm, warning that this may be only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to far-left officials flouting immigration laws.
AOC has long been known for championing sanctuary cities and attacking border agents, often labeling them as “racist” and “oppressors.”
Now, critics say her reckless rhetoric has crossed over into potentially criminal behavior.
“If a sitting congresswoman used her office to harbor an illegal alien, that’s a clear violation of federal law,” Homan declared.

Sources inside ICE say agents have already gathered documentation and begun interviewing individuals connected to the case.
Evidence suggests AOC may have leveraged her political power to block enforcement action against the individual she employed.
House Republicans are demanding accountability, with several calling for a formal ethics investigation into her conduct.
“This is what happens when radicals gain power. They think the law doesn’t apply to them,” said Rep. Andy Biggs.
Democrats quickly circled the wagons, accusing Homan of launching a political smear campaign.
But Homan stood firm, reminding the public that the law is the law and political office offers no immunity from prosecution.
“This isn’t about politics. It’s about national security and public trust,” he said.
Homan emphasized that ICE agents are working independently and that the White House is not interfering in the investigation.
“We are following the facts. If those facts point to criminal activity, then action will be taken,” Homan confirmed.
Legal experts say AOC could face charges ranging from unlawful employment to obstruction of federal agents, depending on the evidence.
Citizens outraged by the news are demanding swift justice and a full public accounting of the congresswoman’s actions.

Homan urged Americans not to let political ideology blind them to the seriousness of the allegations.
“We must restore the rule of law,” he concluded. “No one, no matter how powerful, is above it.”
SENATE ERUPTS!” — Adam Schiff Orders Security to REMOVE John Kennedy, But What Happened Next SHOOK Washington to Its Core psss

SENATE ERUPTS!” — Adam Schiff Orders Security to REMOVE John Kennedy, But What Happened Next SHOOK Washington to Its Core
It was supposed to be a routine Senate oversight hearing — one of those long, dry, procedural sessions where speeches are scripted, tempers stay cool, and cameras pan over rows of silent aides tapping away on laptops.
Prince Harry Doesn’t Accept The DNA Results and Goes INSANE in Court: “My mother didn’t lie…” See more below

Prince Harry Doesn’t Accept The DNA Results and Goes INSANE in Court: “My mother didn’t lie…” See more below![]()
In a moment that no one saw coming, young Princess Charlotte, just nine years old, delivered a message about her father, Prince William, that has left the nation in awe—and sparked a wave of admiration, curiosity, and emotion. It happened during a family-friendly charity event held at

Kensington Gardens, where members of the royal family were interacting with the public to raise awareness for children’s mental health and wellbeing. Prince William was joined by his wife, Princess Catherine, and their three children—George, Charlotte, and Louis—for what was meant to be a light-hearted afternoon of fun, storytelling, and games.Family vacation packagesRoyal memorabilia But what began as a cheerful royal appearance quickly turned into a headline-making moment when Princess Charlotte took to the small stage to speak on behalf of the children’s program she and her brothers were participating in.
Nobody expected her to make a speech. She wasn’t scheduled to. But when a volunteer invited any of the royal children to say a few words, Charlotte raised her hand confidently. With a microphone in hand and the crowd watching in anticipation, she looked directly at her father and said: “I want to tell everyone something about my daddy that people might not know. He doesn’t wear a crown yet, but he already acts like a king. Not because he’s royal, but because he always puts us first, and he always helps people who need it most.” Gasps, followed by a wave of emotional applause, rippled through the crowd. Prince William, visibly moved, smiled and held back tears as Charlotte continued: “When I grow up, I want to help people just like he does. He shows me that being a good person is more important than being a prince or a princess.”
The crowd erupted in cheers and applause. Cameras captured the proud and slightly emotional expression on Prince William’s face as he walked up to hug his daughter in front of the audience. The touching moment between father and daughter was shared widely across social media within hours. Royal watchers and commentators quickly dubbed the speech a “royal bombshell”—not because of controversy, but because of the emotional depth and authenticity it brought to the public image of the monarchy.
1 HOUR AGO! William wept as he revealed Diana’s secret DNA report. Harry beamed with joy telling Charles, but shock froze the Palace. Charles suffered a stroke, whispering in despair: ‘Oh God… the true father is…’”
Buckingham Palace has been thrown into chaos tonight after a secret DNA report — hidden for decades in the late Princess Diana’s private vault — was finally unveiled by Prince William. According to palace insiders, William had quietly been investigating long-buried rumors about his mother’s past, seeking closure for himself and his brother. The shocking envelope, marked “Confidential — Eyes Only”, contained a single page sealed with Diana’s old crest and dated months before her tragic death. When William opened it in the presence of Harry, his hands were trembling. “I can’t believe this… all these years,” he whispered, tears welling in his eyes.
Harry, at first confused, grew visibly emotional as he read the results — and then, unexpectedly, smiled. Witnesses say he rushed through the corridors of Clarence House, calling out for King Charles: “Father… you need to see this. You need to know the truth about Mum.” But the joyous tone didn’t last. As Charles read the report under the soft glow of his study lamp, his expression drained of all color.
According to a senior royal aide, he staggered back, clutching his chest. “Oh God… the true father is…” Charles gasped — before collapsing to the floor. Medical staff were immediately summoned. Alarms echoed through Buckingham as paramedics raced to his side.
