Senate Examining Prior DOJ Effort To Shut Down Probe Into Hillary’s Anti Trump Dossier psss (2kb)
Senate Examining Prior DOJ Effort To Shut Down Probe Into Hillary’s Anti Trump Dossier
The Senate Judiciary Committee is examining whether the Justice Department improperly moved to shut down an inquiry into the Clinton campaign’s funding of the Steele dossier.

Committee Chairman Sen. Charles E. Grassley said a whistleblower has alleged that two senior officials involved in the Justice Department’s Arctic Frost investigation of President Trump previously played key roles in blocking an FBI probe into Hillary Clinton and other Democrats, the Washington Times reported on Friday.
Grassley, a Republican from Iowa, released email exchanges from June 2019 between an unidentified FBI agent and Richard Pilger, then an official in the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section, along with J.P. Cooney, who at the time served as a prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia.
The emails show Pilger and Cooney rejecting the agent’s questions regarding what the agent described as the “unambiguous concealment” of payments made by the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign to fund the Steele dossier, compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele.
The DNC and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign hired the research firm Fusion GPS to help produce the dossier, which contained unverified allegations about then-GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump and saddle him with a phony scandal linking him to Russia. The payments were reported as legal expenses, obscuring the political nature of the project.
In a message to a supervisor, the FBI agent said Pilger made obvious threats that the agent said were “intended to have a chilling effect and stop me from asking questions” about the Clinton and DNC funding, the Times reported.
“In my [redacted] years of being an agent, a successful agent with a great reputation, I have never been met with such suspicion or response intended to have me go away,” the FBI agent noted.
Pilger, who served as director of the Justice Department’s Election Crimes Branch, later played a significant role in authorizing the Arctic Frost investigation into former President Trump’s conduct following the 2020 election. That probe, led by then-Special Counsel Jack Smith, resulted in Trump being indicted on election-interference charges.
Cooney served as Smith’s deputy during the investigation, the Times reported.
In a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel, Sen. Grassley requested additional records and emails related to the FBI’s earlier inquiry into the DNC and Clinton campaign payments to Fusion GPS, which he said appeared to have been halted by Justice Department officials.
“These records show the same partisans who rushed to cover for Clinton rabidly pursued Arctic Frost, which was a runaway train aimed directly at President Trump and the Republican political apparatus,” Grassley wrote.
In a June 21, 2019, email, Pilger criticized an FBI agent for seeking to open an investigation into whether payments had been concealed, accusing the agent of showing “bias” and acting with “a rush to judgment.” A week earlier, on June 14, Cooney had advised the same agent that the issue “is not a good candidate to open for a false reporting case,” noting that Fusion GPS had been retained by the Clinton campaign’s law firm, Perkins Coie, rather than by the campaign itself.
“Although not typically what we think of as legal services, I think we would have an exceedingly difficult time proving it was a willfully false report,” Cooney said in a note to the agent, the Times reported.
The dossier — later discredited as a collection of unverified claims — alleged improper ties between Trump and Russia. The document circulated ahead of the 2016 presidential election and was subsequently cited by the FBI, then led by Director James Comey, to support the opening of a secret investigation into the Trump campaign.
The Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee were not criminally investigated over the underlying payments but instead faced civil penalties after watchdog groups filed complaints with the Federal Election Commission, said the Times.
In 2022, the FEC fined the Clinton campaign $8,000 and the DNC $105,000 for misreporting more than $1 million in payments to the law firm Perkins Coie, which used the funds to hire Fusion GPS.
Sh0cking Fallout: Tulsi Gabbard’s Bold Response to Adam Schiff’s ‘Putin’s Puppet’ Insult!

Tulsi Gabbard’s Stunning Comeback: The Day Adam Schiff Was Exposed
In a dramatic showdown that left the political world reeling, Tulsi Gabbard turned the tables on Congressman Adam Schiff during a Senate hearing, exposing a web of deceit and manipulation that has shaken the foundations of American politics. What started as an attempt by Schiff to discredit Gabbard as a “Putin’s puppet” quickly spiraled into a devastating revelation of his own misdeeds, leading to one of the most significant political reversals in recent history.

The Setup
On the morning of the hearing, tensions ran high in the Hart Senate Building. Adam Schiff, known for his theatrical flair and aggressive stance against perceived threats to national security, arrived armed with a meticulously prepared dossier aimed at dismantling Gabbard’s credibility. His staff had spent weeks compiling evidence of what they claimed were her ties to foreign adversaries, hoping to end her political career once and for all. However, Schiff had no idea that Gabbard was prepared for a fight that would expose his own questionable actions.
As the clock struck 10 a.m., Gabbard entered the hearing room with a calm demeanor, carrying only a thin manila folder and a silver laptop. Her understated appearance contrasted sharply with Schiff’s anxious energy, and observers sensed an impending clash. The gallery was filled with veterans and media, creating an electric atmosphere that hinted at the drama to unfold.
The Hearing Begins
Schiff wasted no time launching into his accusations, painting Gabbard as a threat to American intelligence. “Putin’s puppet has no business accessing our nation’s secrets,” he declared, setting the stage for what he believed would be a decisive blow against her. Gabbard, however, remained unfazed. As Schiff rattled off his claims, she took notes with a slight smile, exuding the confidence of a seasoned warrior.
When it was her turn to respond, Gabbard shifted the narrative. “Thank you for that passionate performance,” she began, subtly undermining Schiff’s credibility. “Since you’ve raised the topic of foreign influence and propaganda, perhaps this is the perfect moment for what I call a comparative analysis.” Schiff’s expression shifted from confidence to concern as he realized Gabbard was about to unleash a counteroffensive.
The Turning Point
With a calm yet commanding presence, Gabbard revealed that she had spent months preparing not just to defend herself but to expose the weaponization of the intelligence community for political gain. She slid her laptop across the table, opening it with the care of someone handling sensitive ammunition. “For every lie you tell about me, I have documented evidence of two you’ve told about others,” she stated, her voice steady and authoritative.
The room fell silent as she pulled up emails, texts, and recorded conversations that detailed Schiff’s own manipulations. “This laptop contains five years of your communications, all legally obtained, all devastating.” The tension in the room was palpable as Gabbard laid bare Schiff’s actions, revealing a pattern of deceit that contradicted his public persona as a defender of democracy.
As she presented her evidence, the atmosphere shifted dramatically. Gabbard’s calm demeanor and the weight of her revelations began to erode Schiff’s carefully constructed narrative. The veterans in the gallery, initially there to support Gabbard, now leaned forward, captivated by the unfolding drama.
The Fallout
With each piece of evidence Gabbard presented, Schiff’s composure crumbled. She detailed how he had misled the public about Russian collusion, revealing emails where he coordinated with media outlets to keep the narrative alive even when evidence was lacking. “You knew there was no evidence to support your claims,” Gabbard asserted, her voice rising with conviction. “Yet you continued to lie to the American people.”
As the hearing progressed, the tide had completely turned. Schiff, once the aggressor, now stood exposed as a man who had abused his power, weaponizing intelligence for political advantage. Gabbard’s revelations painted a clear picture of a politician more interested in maintaining his narrative than in upholding the truth.
The gallery erupted in murmurs, and several senators began to distance themselves from Schiff. The atmosphere shifted from one of political theater to a reckoning, as the reality of Schiff’s actions became undeniable.
The Final Blow
Just when it seemed Schiff could not be further humiliated, Gabbard revealed the most damaging piece of evidence: a FISA application that had been used to surveil her while she served in the military. “You spied on me, Congressman, while I was in uniform,” she declared, her voice cutting through the chaos. The room fell silent, the gravity of her words hanging heavily in the air.
The evidence showed that Schiff had used lies to justify surveillance against a fellow American, violating not only her rights but also the sanctity of the intelligence community. “You turned the awesome power of American intelligence against an American family because you couldn’t accept that your political opponent was exactly what she appeared to be—a patriot serving her country,” she charged.
As the hearing reached its climax, calls for Schiff’s accountability echoed through the chamber. Senators from both parties began to call for immediate investigations into Schiff’s actions, recognizing the severity of the situation. The fallout from Gabbard’s revelations would undoubtedly reshape the political landscape.
Aftermath and Accountability
In the weeks following the hearing, the consequences of Schiff’s actions became increasingly apparent. Investigations were launched into his conduct, revealing a pattern of abuse that extended beyond Gabbard’s case. The FBI uncovered a trove of evidence detailing illegal surveillance operations targeting political opponents, journalists, and even fellow members of Congress.
As the media landscape shifted, Gabbard’s victory became a rallying point for those advocating for transparency and accountability in government. Whistleblowers began to come forward, emboldened by Gabbard’s courage to expose corruption. The narrative that had once been dominated by Schiff’s lies was now being rewritten by the truth.
Gabbard’s appointment as Director of National Intelligence marked a new era for the intelligence community. Her commitment to restoring integrity and accountability resonated with veterans, intelligence professionals, and the American public alike. “The cancer of corruption will be cut out completely and permanently,” she promised, setting a tone of reform that echoed throughout the halls of power.
Conclusion
The dramatic showdown between Tulsi Gabbard and Adam Schiff serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of accountability in politics. In a time when trust in government institutions is waning, Gabbard’s revelations have sparked a renewed call for transparency and integrity.
As the dust settles from this remarkable political battle, one thing is clear: the truth has a way of emerging, no matter how deeply it is buried. Tulsi Gabbard’s unwavering dedication to her principles has not only reshaped her own career but has also set a new standard for those in positions of power. The reckoning has begun, and the American people are watching closely as the fight for truth and justice continues.
Ben Shephard opens up about personal challenges — fans surprised by his honesty and what he’s kept private

He’s widely admired as one of the most composed, professional, and approachable faces on British television. For years, Ben Shephard has brought warmth, wit, and reliability to millions of viewers as the host of This Morning, Tipping Point, and countless other shows. His polished smile and effortless charm have made him a household name — the type of presenter people feel they can trust.
But behind that trademark smile, those who know him best say life hasn’t been as seamless as it may appear on screen. Recently, whispers have begun to surface suggesting that Ben has been quietly navigating one of the most challenging periods of his life — both personally and professionally.
According to people close to the presenter, the last year has placed him under extraordinary pressure. From professional shifts in television schedules to private matters that remain undisclosed, sources say he’s been carrying far more than most of his audience would ever guess.

“Ben always puts others first,” a friend revealed. “He’s the kind of person who shows up for everyone — his colleagues, his family, even strangers. But lately, it’s like he’s running on empty. You can see it in his eyes. Something is weighing on him, even though he continues to smile for the cameras.”
The speculation first began when viewers noticed subtle changes in his television presence. Loyal fans pointed out that he had taken a few unexpected days off from his usual slots and, at times, appeared more serious and reflective during live broadcasts. While he still delivered his signature professionalism, there was a noticeable shift — one that left viewers wondering if more was happening beneath the surface.
Adding fuel to the rumours, Ben has also stepped back from several public events that he was previously expected to attend. For someone who has always been so active in media appearances and community engagements, this retreat struck many as unusual.
“He’s reassessing everything,” another insider claimed. “It’s not just about work — it’s about life. His career, his family, his sense of direction in the industry. Ben has built this reputation for being solid and dependable, but even the strongest people eventually reach a point where they need to pause and take stock.”
Of course, no official statement has been released from Ben or his team. Much of what is being said remains speculation, and those closest to him emphasize that his priority right now is finding balance and protecting his wellbeing. Still, fans have taken to social media to express their unwavering support, hoping to remind him of just how much he means to viewers.

“Ben Shephard has given so much to us as an audience for so many years,” one fan wrote on X. “Whatever he’s going through, I hope he knows we’re all behind him.”
Another shared: “You can tell he’s such a genuine person. If he needs time away from TV, I hope he takes it. Health and happiness come first.”
What makes Ben’s situation so striking is the contrast between his on-screen persona and the reported struggles behind the scenes. For decades, he has represented stability and good-natured charm on British television, never letting the pressures of the industry show. But as these recent developments suggest, even those who appear strongest in the public eye are human — carrying challenges the rest of the world may never see.
Industry insiders believe this may be a turning point for Ben. Some suggest he could use this time to reinvent himself, perhaps pursuing new creative projects or focusing on ventures outside of traditional television. Others believe he may simply step back to devote more time to his family, something he has always spoken about with deep pride.

Ben has often shared how important his wife and two sons are to him, describing them as his grounding force. Fans who follow him on social media have frequently seen glimpses of his life as a devoted dad — cheering on his sons at sports events, enjoying quiet family holidays, and celebrating milestones together. It’s possible that this new chapter is less about stepping away from work and more about stepping closer to what matters most at home.
Whatever direction he takes, one thing is clear: Ben Shephard is more than just a presenter. He is a man who, like many others, is navigating life’s highs and lows while trying to maintain a sense of balance. His story serves as a reminder that behind every polished smile is a person with struggles, doubts, and moments of vulnerability.
And perhaps that’s why the response from fans has been so compassionate. Viewers don’t just admire him for being a good presenter; they feel connected to him as a person. Whether he chooses to return to screens with renewed energy, explore new opportunities, or step back entirely, supporters are making it clear they will stand by him.

In many ways, this could mark the beginning of Ben’s most important chapter yet. Not just as a broadcaster, but as someone willing to redefine what success and happiness look like on his own terms.
For now, fans are left waiting and watching — offering love, support, and encouragement to a man who has given them countless moments of joy and connection. And as one supporter put it perfectly online:
“Ben has always been there for us on our screens. Now it’s time for us to be there for him.”